Honor OS Customization and Smoothness

Charan_DSCR

The user interface (UI) skin of the Honor phone is outstanding! I recommend that the team at Nothing bring this level of customization and smoothness to Nothing OS 4.

vovan-v

Charan_DSCR wow what a feauteres! 😳 i mostly like the smart folders and widgets rolling.

Satish Kumar 🇮🇳

Charan_DSCR I like the animation and control panel!!?

mafcarvalho

Charan_DSCR Hi. I respect that some people like all the customisation available in MagicOS. If you want such features then I recommend buying a Honor phone. Please don’t expect Nothing to copy iOS features like that useless dynamic island.

Nothing OS is all about a more purist Android experience with a touch of nice design features added. It’s simple yet effective, just like Google Pixel phones. Trying to copy Honor would kill the ethos of the Nothing brand.

Mr_Mariner1998

Charan_DSCR Nothing is is purely based on Oxygen os so better not to go out of that bruh😁

hrry

Hey mate 👋 former EMUI user, so I do like parts of MagicOS.

What are your favourite magicOS features that you’d like to see come to Nothing OS?

RohithTony

vovan-v me too I love it that features, hope nothing add smart sidebar

hrry

vovan-v Me too. The widgets of MagicOS/EMUI are especially good.

One feature I liked EMUI was being able to swipe up on icons to take quick action, for example, being able to scan a QR code from the browser of start a workout from health.

RajeevKumar_vNXavrqAJ7

mafcarvalho minimalism and usefulness doesn’t go together.

If i want to share some content from app to another i would have to take screenshot first then edit it then send.

Here, how minimalism helped me ??

We want features that make NOS faster to use and do things. Am I wrong ??

Sourav_Satvaya yes I agree.

But NOS should implement features that makes our usage a little easier.

SamuraiTronVC

My opinion on this-

While smoothness (slow is smooth, smooth is fast) is always welcome, I wouldn’t like NothingOS turn into every other skin out there.

It’s stock-ish android with a pinch of Nothing goodness (design and small yet big QoL improvements) added. That’s part of the Nothing charm, as the famous quote of “less=better” in some cases. “Reduction” as said in The Bear series.

I welcome more little yet big QoL stuff and more Nothing design improvements ofcourse.

And NOS3.0 as per rumours and stuff, it seems to be heading in a good direction instead of straying too far from the stock-ish or more accurately “minimal/nothing” experience.

For stock-ish+a lot of customisations, people have Moto.

I would hate to see what people that were ex-Samsung/Xiaomi etc users did to OxygenOS by asking them too much stuff from heavier skins.

Let’s enjoy the differences of the skins/OSes instead of turning every Android skin into the same looking and tasting dishes with different garnishes and names.

singhnsk

SamuraiTronVC With due respect, since most of the innovation in phones today is software-led, it essentially comes down to what the operating system offers. And in the future, the feature set will be a differentiating factor, not to say it isn’t already. But once Nothing OS’s basic catch-up will complete, then the next obvious step would be to add more functionality that helps them make their OS offering enriched and more competitive.

No matter how much praise the barebones Pixel devices would get, the fact is that Pixel phones barely sell, and none of the phone vendors trying to retain customers with a barebones OS have succeeded. Google heavily promoted Android One, yet it had the same fate as its predecessors.

I’m not asking or demanding that the Nothing OS look like iOS or something else, but I am interested in more features to be built into the OS. Whatever happened to Oxygen OS was Oppo’s plan to unify the brand resources and reduce their costs. It does not connect with user demands. The OS can still look and feel clean and simple while adding more functionality that people coming from other vendors would definitely be missing.

Keseven

SamuraiTronVC You are so right. Honor, Oppo, Vivo, Realme, Xiaomi, OnePlus, Moto.. so many brands these people could have bought, but they picked Nothing and then demanding heavy customization. I hope Carl Pei won’t change Nothing, like how OnePlus drifted away from OxygenOS. Now we finally get to experience OxygenOS-like again, with NothingOS.

mafcarvalho

singhnsk with all due respect, let me add some info to your comment. Before I got the Nothing Phone 2a my phone was a Google Pixel 7a. If it wasn’t stolen I’d probably be using it today.

Android in Pixel phones is far from what I’d call barebones these days. Google frequently adds “feature drops” to their phones, which basically means that users get some pretty unique and useful extra features along the way. It’s amazing how they are able to add really useful features while maintaining a simple visual approach that works so well.

I never said that Nothing shouldn’t add functionality to the OS. It’s quite obvious that we expect more features to be added. What I mean is that Nothing should maintain it’s own identity instead of copying other OEMs.

I know this isn’t easy. But I do know that I liked Xiaomi’s MIUI (HyperOS now) until I got tired of it trying too hard to be iOS on Android. To each their own.

singhnsk

mafcarvalho Fair enough. I didn’t intend to say there aren’t any takers for stock Android. There’s a market for it, but it is rather small. Since it is each person’s preference, I wouldn’t argue, but I want to put forward my opinion that most of the feature drops in Pixel phones are redundant where most of them are limited by markets, and then they are often just catch-ups to things that other OS flavors have offered for years. A good example is the long screenshots; even though Google managed to add it a few years ago after being several years late, it is still way inferior compared to the implementation done by Samsung and others. Yes, Google is doing a fine job with caller enhancements, for example, but only if they’ll readily become available to users globally. I also do not see most of their enhancements as “useful”, but once again it is more of a personal preference. I wouldn’t mind if I’m called a “Pixel-hater” because I have never found a reason to love it in the first place. I’ll personally choose anything else but a Pixel.

I fully agree that Nothing should maintain an identity and add features thoughtfully so that they integrate well into the overall UI experience.

mafcarvalho

SkynetT1000 if I could only understand wth you mean… where did you see me say that copying from Apple or iOS is a good thing? Let’s calm down the “conversation” right away. I know it’s hard for people to interpret what others wrote. We can’t read minds… 🤷🏻

I use Android since v1.6 on HTC Sense. I’ve used more than enough Android flavours to know what I like and what I don’t.

Apple is the most despicable company in the world and I never understood the sheep around their outdated, overhyped and overpriced tech. It’s true that design-wise Nothing phones are quite Apple-esque. In terms of software they’re not and I’m grateful for that.

Sourav_Satvaya

SkynetT1000 IF NOTHING PHONES ARE not allowed heavy customization than no one should buy any kind of nothing products and only buy Apple product where heavy customization is not allowed . we choose Android over iOS only because of heavy customization.

Not everyone likes “Heavy Customisation”, some prefer minimal customisation like back in the days Nexus had, original OxygenOS had. There’s nowhere written that Android should be heavily customised from the OEMs side. Users can change the look and feel of any Android skin using right app like a custom launcher, icon pack or a widget maker. If someone wants lots of features baked into the OS then there’s other options too. That’s why there are tons of options in the market. If someone likes heavy customisation then they can buy Xiaomi, Honor or some other brand which has baked in lots of features. If someone is buying a phone then that’s their responsibility to do some research about the phone before buying whether it fits the user or not. It’s irrational to complaint about not having high customisation after buying a Nothing phone when they should have noticed it before buying.

singhnsk

Sourav_Satvaya It’s quite simple, you see. If somebody wants to customize more, he customizes more. If he doesn’t want to, he keeps it the default way. Sorted, right?

The OS should provide for features and/or API points where first-party or third-party apps can integrate and expand the functionality. And anybody who’s not interested in spending his time customizing all parts of the OS can just not touch those options.

PS: I am not a customizer. Apart from changing the wallpaper, I’d keep the phone the way it was for years. But I’d be glad to have features and options that I’d probably never use instead of not having them at all. It helps those who need it or maybe my use case changes in the future 🙂

Charan_DSCR

One thing I would like to say weather u like it or not

A good artist copy but a great artist steal