Anonymous1436 I mean, Iām already parroting at this point, but why does it have to be Nothing Gallery? Why not Google Photos, which is superior in every single regard, especially with all those AI and āAIā features?
Insisting on Nothing Gallery is no different than refusing to use Affinity Photo or Adobe Photoshop on Windows and instead demanding that Microsoft pack all those features into MS Paint (which comes with Windows, just like Nothing Gallery comes with Nothing OS).
Why would you refuse to use a superior product that already has the features you want, only to insist on using an inferior one (Nothing Gallery is good, but it isnāt Google-Photos-good) and hope it eventually gains the functionality of the better product?
