🌿 Which one looks better? 🌿

sayan_mondal_sm06

I clicked this shot of wild grass near the lake. The first one is raw (unedited) and the second one is edited for more color and contrast.

📸 First one (Raw) – More natural and true to the moment

🎨 Second one (Edited) – More vibrant and dreamy

👉 Vote below:

1️⃣ First one (Raw)

2️⃣ Second one (Edited)

Also tell me why you

chose it!

Asy1bek47

sayan_mondal_sm06 At first I thought the second one looked nice, but after looking I noticed that the second one’s object itself was also somehow not original. And the first one’s object quality is very good 🔥

Abhinav Singh

sayan_mondal_sm06 2nd one no doubt

4ki

sayan_mondal_sm06 Looking at them from afar, i preferred the 2nd pic. But after i opened them, the 1st one looked way better.

HiphopDancer

sayan_mondal_sm06 second row

Smii

I prefer the first one, myself - I’m not a fan of blur that isn’t optical (as a result of the physics of lenses, but applied computationally) as it never looks quite right.
It’s a lovely picture!

sayan_mondal_sm06

Smii wow Aone quality suggestions 🫣🙏

sayan_mondal_sm06

Asy1bek47 every first things is always better 😭

themountofmint

Love the first one!

sayan_mondal_sm06

themountofmint our lovable first one 😭

RaghulNish

From which nothing phone?

sayan_mondal_sm06

RaghulNish it’s nothing phone 3a pro

CMF1_hacker

1 looks natural, 2 looks PP’d to hell and back.

I’m a fan of 1 but I’ve been taking digital since 1999 and usually shoot dSLR with my favourite glass that produces a nice bokeh (maybe 120k snaps between all my cameras).

I understand this is personal preference and usually a generational difference. There are also strong culture preferences and I speculate this is due to the range of colour palletes employed in daily life (compare Copenhagen and Chennai).

MuntimadugukhursheedaM_khurshe

Looking amazing

sayan_mondal_sm06

4ki all is relativity 🙈

UniverseofScience

The 2nd one, the vibrant colors make it so appealing and full of life.