asalynskii
Hey @asalynskii ā absolutely spot on! šš„ I couldnāt agree more.
@Smii , I get where youāre coming from about design and premium feel. But hereās the thing: when a brand markets something as a ātrue flagshipā, itās not just about aesthetic vibes ā itās about delivering on all fronts: chipset, display, battery, charging, cameras, software, and price point.
As @asalynskii pointed out so well, brands like OnePlus and even Poco have shown us whatās possible at lower price points. When they can offer near-flagship specs (like Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, big batteries, crazy fast charging, unique designs) for around ā¹30Kāā¹50K, it really makes you question how Nothing justifies ā¹80K with compromises on core flagship specs.
Of course, most people might not ānoticeā chipset differences in daily use, but if youāre promising 5 years of software updates, you better have the hardware to keep up smoothly for that long. Otherwise, whatās the point of future-proofing? š¤·āāļø
Weāre not saying Poco or others have the same premium software experience as Nothing. But at the end of the day, people weigh value for money. If youāre asking a premium price, the phone should feel premium everywhere ā not just in the hand but also in the phone spec.
As @asalynskii said perfectly:
Nothing is asking too much for a phone that doesnāt deliver enough to justify the price.
And thatās the core of it ā no hate, just facts. āļøš¬